Registration / Login
text version
War and Peace

 Hot news

Main page » Commentaries » View
Printable version
Why is China making a fuss about the Nobel?
08.12.10 12:29 Asia rising
By Kerry Brown Senior Fellow, Chatham House Asia Programme

Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Jiang Yu declared on Tuesday that any country sending representatives to the ceremony in Oslo awarding the Nobel Peace Prize to Liu Xiaobo were "clowns".

In Chinas eyes, the jailed dissident is a criminal. Their response to the award of the Nobel Peace Prize to him has been shrill and unrelenting.

Many wonder why the fuss, when the prize has long been regarded by many as highly politicised and increasingly irrelevant.

Nobel prizes may have lost their lustre in China today, but they have not, it seems, wholly lost their allure.

Wandering around a bookshop in a provincial Chinese city in 1995, I was astonished to see a multi-volume set of books, comprising representative works of every single Nobel Prize in Literature winner since its inception.

Most of the figures were long forgotten. But this collection, all translated into Chinese, was symptomatic of just how strong the desire in China at that time was for the country to have its own authentic winner of one of the prizes.

And while former winners who were ethnically Chinese were always accorded a warm welcome back in their ancestral home, the government put a lot of effort and money into gaining one of these throughout the late 1980s and early 1990s.

The 2001 Literature award to emigre Chinese writer Gao Xingjian was a rude awakening.

Gao had written unflattering things about modern China, and not even lived there since 1990. His works were condemned as decadent by the authorities.

Since then, the public support for the Nobel prizes has dimmed.

Humiliation

But privately, the Nobel Prize, for whatever discipline, still maintains an extraordinary resonance in China.

It is linked to the pursuit of modernity, global recognition and academic and intellectual excellence that the country has tried to pursue through its educational and economic policies.

That the countrys most senior leaders have sanctioned an all-out diplomatic onslaught after Mr Lius success might seem surprising - but they are in a quandary.

For many of the more nationalist bloggers, like Wang Xiaodong and his co-authors of the 2009 bestseller, China is Not Happy, this kind of slap in the face from a formerly esteemed and admired Western institution is exactly the kind of thing they most protest against.

"We took your advice and modernised using Western means," Mr Wang and his fellow writers complain, "and then the West rejects us."
Liu Xiaobo Mr Liu is the only person to have won the Nobel prize while still in China

The implication is that the West is ganging up on a China that is increasingly playing the modernising game created outside its borders to its own advantage.

The Nobel Prize, in this context, looks like a form of intellectual containment and rejection.

It is seen as a deliberate attempt by Western elites to humiliate and embarrass China and its current leaders, challenging their legitimacy and authority.

The bottom line is that China, at least on the record of winners so far, cannot produce internationally recognised scientists, economists, writers and public figures.

All it can produce are world-class dissidents.

The one laureate in the Peoples Republic of Chinas history who gained the prize while still in the country is a prisoner, jailed for 11 years on Christmas Day in 2009 for state subversion.

Clash of civilisations

Beijing could have exercised lofty disdain, much as the Soviet Union did when Andre Sakharov was awarded his prize in 1977.

No public comment was given, his family were allowed to attend the ceremony, and the event received no coverage in the Soviet media.

But for the Chinese government, who have high levels of disdain for the record of their former socialist brothers across the border in Russia, this offers no model.

To them, having implemented profound economic and social changes in the last three decades, the Wests continued refusal to celebrate this and to look only at problem areas is an insult.

Right or wrong, the dialogue is now hardening into precisely the kind of "clash of civilisations" that former elite leaders in China like Deng Xiaoping in the 1980s did their best to avoid.
 

Ðóññêèé
Archive
Forum

 Exclusiveread more rss

» Destruction of Ukraine’s Central Bank
» The World files their 27 Grievances against the United States of America.
» Yom Kippur War Redux – Petrol D0llar’s Last Hurrah
» How the Alchemists saved the Planet in 2019
» What will the US Treaty of Paris look like?
» Addition by Subtraction, (x, y)↦x−y
» Too Little, Too Late, will there be a Romanov ending for the Sudairi Seven?
» Week 21: When economic arguments end, the arms race begins

 Newsread more rss

» Afghan Taliban leader accuses U.S. of creating doubts over pact
» Kyrgyz President Accuses Atambayev of Violating Constitution by Resisting Detention
» Chinese foreign ministry slams U.S. interference in Venezuela
» With an eye on Russia, China and a horse, Pentagon chief visits Mongolia
» Pentagon Claims Iran Uses GPS Jamming in the Gulf So It Can Lure and Seize Foreign Ships
» USAF X-37B Military Space Planes Mystery Mission Circling Earth Hits 700 Days
» China destabilizing Indo-Pacific: U.S. Defense Secretary
» EU must change its negotiating terms for Brexit, says Barclay

 Reportsread more rss

» A Brief History of the CIA’s Dirty War in South Sudan
» US GDP report: Keynes on steroids
» Are Russia and the US Finally on the Same Page in Afghanistan?
» The IMF Takeover of Pakistan
» Voices from Syria’s Rukban Refugee Camp Belie Corporate Media Reporting
» Report Shows Corporations and Bolsonaro Teaming Up to Destroy the Amazon
» Ukraine: the presidents change, but the oligarchical system remains the same
» The Cowardice of Aung San Suu Kyi

 Commentariesread more rss

» The Biggest Threat to the US Indo-Pacific Strategy? Washington Itself.
» Ukraine on the cusp of change
» India’s Looming Agricultural Crisis: A Unique Chance to Change the System?
» The Saker interviews Stephen Karganovic
» Media and Politicians Ignore Oncoming Financial Crisis
» In an astonishing turn, George Soros and Charles Koch team up to end US ‘forever war’ policy
» Vladimir Putin says liberalism has ‘become obsolete’
» You Are Fighting In The Most Important Battle Of All Time

 Analysisread more rss

» A battle for supremacy between China and the US
» UAE Withdrawal from Yemen
» US, Pakistan move in tandem to end Afghan war
» Is Baoshang Bank China’s Lehman Brothers?
» From the Green Revolution to GMOs: Toxic Agriculture Is the Problem Not the Solution
» OPEC+ oil supply cuts signal smooth Gulf sailing
» G20 Osaka: the end of American leadership?
» Trump’s Brilliant Strategy to Dismember U.S. Dollar Hegemony
 
text version The site was founded by Natalia Laval in 2006 © 2006-2026 Inca Group "War and Peace"