Registration / Login
text version
War and Peace

 Hot news

Touring the Backyard: Putin Pays Central Asia a Visit
Donbass blockade is finishing off Poroshenko and Akhmetov
If US throws Ukraine under the bus, will Moscow reciprocate?
Military Situation Remains Tense In Eastern Ukraine
Main page » News » View
Printable version
The Limits of Agricultural Reform in North Korea
20.12.15 12:07 Asia rising

Agricultural reforms in North Korea became a hot topic of discussion almost right away when Kim Jong-un took power in 2011. Only a number of months into his tenure, news began to come out of the country about attempts at agricultural reforms. It is unclear when (or even if) the June 28th Measures were finally extended to the whole country.

At the very least, three years in, it seems beyond reasonable doubt that North Korean agriculture has undergone major changes. These have been aimed at boosting production by creating better incentives for farmers to produce and sell more of their output to the state rather than diverting it to the market. The most important aspects of these reforms are the decreased size of work teams and new rules that let farmers keep 30 percent of their production plus any surplus above production targets, while the state takes the remaining 70 percent.

These changes have been met with optimism among some. However, no one really knows exactly what impact these reforms have had. North Korean agriculture may be faring better than it used to – although this is also doubtful – but even so, it is too simplistic to assume that government reforms in agricultural management are doing all the work. As long as North Korea’s agriculture continues to be centrally planned by the state, there will be limits to how much better it can get, no matter what reforms the state implements.

To see why, consider some of the news that has been coming out of North Korea in the past few months, as reported by Daily NK. In late November, the online daily reported that (despite reports to the contrary by multilateral aid organizations), North Korea had seen relatively good harvests this year. However, the increased harvests, according to people inside the country, were not caused by changes in the agricultural management system of state-operated collective farms.

Rather, the North Koreans interviewed for the story claimed that private plot farmers had been better able to protect their crops from adverse weather impacts by using water pumps and other equipment. Even though trends like these probably have a limited impact, this shows that many circumstances other than state management matter.

A few weeks later, Daily NK published another interview carrying a similar message. According to sources inside the country, harvests from collective farms have declined, while private plot production has gone up (emphasis added):

The amount of food harvested this year from the collective farms has “once again fallen short of expectations,” he said, adding that the farmers who work on them have criticized the orders coming down from the authorities, saying that “if we do things the way they want us to, it’s not going to work.”

Although the regime has forced people to mobilize, the source asserted that farm yields are not increasing. So, then, “the best thing to do would be to further divide the land up among individuals,” he posited.

Our source wondered if individual farms were not more successful because each person tending them personally grew and watered their plants. Currently, farmers must follow directives regarding the amount of water they can use on collective farms. He warned that if the system is not completely overhauled, crop yields will fail to improve.

In other words: as is so often the case, management orders from above often do not align with the reality on the ground.

One should be careful not to draw too many general conclusions based on individual interviews, but this is a well known general problem in all planned economies. Even with the best intentions, the state can never be fully informed about conditions and resources on the ground in an entire society.

This is one of the many reasons why economic central planning falters. We have seen this, too, with Kim Jong-un’s forestry policies. The state gives orders that have unintended consequences on the ground, because information is lacking. No central planning team can be fully informed about the reality prevailing throughout the system. The information problem becomes particularly dire in authoritarian dictatorships like North Korea, where people at the lower end of hierarchies often have strong incentives not to speak up about implementation problems when orders come from the top.

Ultimately, no matter what management reforms the North Korean regime implements, the country’s economic system remains the basic stumbling block. As long as central planning continues to be the ambition of economic and agricultural policies, there will be a limit to the success that agricultural policies can reach. We may expect to see agricultural reforms continuing, but as long as the system remains, they can hardly be revolutionary.

Benjamin Katzeff Silberstein is the co-editor of North Korean Economy Watch. He is a PhD Student in History at the University of Pennsylvania and a non-resident Kelly Fellow at Pacific Forum CSIS.

 
 Orphus: ORPS

Archive
Forum

 Exclusiveread more rss

» Addition by Subtraction, (x, y)↦x−y
» Too Little, Too Late, will there be a Romanov ending for the Sudairi Seven?
» Week 21: When economic arguments end, the arms race begins
» Is Germany losing yet another world war?
» The Islamic State (ISIS) is Made in America: The Pentagon had Planned the Fall of Mosul and Ramadi in 2012
» Has Merkel Been Abandoned?
» The Islamic State and Chaos in the Greater Middle East
» Council on Foreign Relations Grand Strategy: China Must Be Defeated, The TPP Is Essential to Undermining China

 Newsread more rss

» Integrating the Army Into the US Approach to the Pacific
» Russian jets mistakenly bomb US-backed forces in Syria
» Touring the Backyard: Putin Pays Central Asia a Visit
» ISIS Changes Format of War in Iraq Using Partisan Methods
» Great Wall of the EU: China at the gates
» Donbass blockade is finishing off Poroshenko and Akhmetov
» Israel targeted under law passed to help 9/11 families sue Saudis
» Morocco threatens to cut EU ties if farm deal flounders

 Reportsread more rss

» The Cowardice of Aung San Suu Kyi
» EU Steps Up The Pace For Cashless Society In 2017/18
» Islamic States Khorasan Province, 2 Years on
» Can Afghanistans Economy Rebound in 2017?
» Trump triumphed due to downward mobility
» Americas Secret African Drone War Against the Islamic State
» Putin Goes Ballistic In Syria, Obliterates The USAs Secret Mideast Strategy
» Grassroots Fascism: The War Experience of the Japanese People

 Commentariesread more rss

» Moscows wriggle room shrinking vis-à-vis Trump
» The $2 Trillion Gamble That Saudi Arabia Cannot Win
» Frances election in total chaos for the mainstream
» If US throws Ukraine under the bus, will Moscow reciprocate?
» Russian Mercenaries In Syria And Around The World
» Did Bayer AG do a Sly Deal on Glyphosate with EU Commission?
» The road to democracy
» Why Pakistan let out a Top Secret

 Analysisread more rss

» The cancer of bankers
» Will Trump Destroy the Euro?
» The magic of bankers
» Pakistan and China: Dont Fear Chabahar Port
» South Africas Opposition See Eye to Eye with Trump
» Rex Tillerson and the Myths, Lies and Oil Wars to Come
» Incipient Hybrid War in South Central Africa and Mozambique
» Trump Killed TPP. Whats Next For Trade in Asia?
 
text version 2006-2016 Inca Group "War and Peace"