Registration / Login
text version
War and Peace

 Hot news

Main page » News » View
Printable version
Turkey accepts NATO missile plan
20.11.10 19:42 Iran
Turkey accepts NATO missile plan
Sat Nov 20, 2010 1:53PM
Turkish President Abdullah Gul
After NATO conceded not to single out Iran as a target in its missile plan, Turkey has accepted the alliances decision to deploy a missile system on its soil.


"The strategic concept adopted yesterday is in line with our expectations. We are very pleased about that," Turkish President Abdullah Gul said on Saturday.

In a "strategic concept" released Friday, which details NATO priorities for the next decade, NATO leaders agreed to "develop the capability to defend our populations and territories against ballistic missile attack as a core element of our collective defense."

In September, Secretary-General of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Anders Fogh Rasmussen proposed to develop a 200-million-euro (253-million-dollar) US-backed missile system around Europe against possible attacks by "rogue states."

The NATO chief then named Irans nuclear program as one of the reasons that justify the necessity of a missile system, and said, "If Iran eventually acquires a nuclear capability, that will be very dangerous, and a direct threat to the allies."

This is while Iran, as a member of the International Atomic Energy Agency and a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, has declared that it has no plan to develop a military nuclear program.

Amid Western efforts to persuade Turkey to join the NATO missile system, Ankara announced that a plan which singles out Iran as a threat would be unacceptable.

"Mentioning one country, Iran... is wrong and will not happen. A particular country will not be targeted.... We will definitely not accept that," Gul said earlier this month.

"We do not perceive any threat from any neighbor countries and we do not think our neighbors form a threat to NATO," Turkeys Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said in October.

Following Turkeys demand, Rasmussen said last week that "it (the final plans of the missile system) need not mention the names of any particular country."

Rasmussen said a total of 30 countries possess ballistic systems that could hit Europe, adding that "this is reality; you dont need to mention names."

NATO member states have also been trying to ensure Russias cooperation in the project.

“By reaching out and inviting Russia to cooperate with us, I believe we also have a real chance to build a security roof for the entire Euro-Atlantic area,” Rasmussen said in the two-day NATO summit in Lisbon on Friday.

Russia, however, has been extremely critical of the plan, arguing that the missile system would be a threat to its sovereignty and that it is meant to pacify its ballistic capability.

Just ahead of the summit, Russia played down the chances of any major breakthrough.

We should first determine "who, how and when can get hold of missile technologies capable of posing a threat to both Russia and NATO member states," Russias Ambassador to NATO Dmitry Rogozin said earlier this year.

 

Ðóññêèé
Archive
Forum

 Exclusiveread more rss

» Destruction of Ukraine’s Central Bank
» The World files their 27 Grievances against the United States of America.
» Yom Kippur War Redux – Petrol D0llar’s Last Hurrah
» How the Alchemists saved the Planet in 2019
» What will the US Treaty of Paris look like?
» Addition by Subtraction, (x, y)↦x−y
» Too Little, Too Late, will there be a Romanov ending for the Sudairi Seven?
» Week 21: When economic arguments end, the arms race begins

 Newsread more rss

» Afghan Taliban leader accuses U.S. of creating doubts over pact
» Kyrgyz President Accuses Atambayev of Violating Constitution by Resisting Detention
» Chinese foreign ministry slams U.S. interference in Venezuela
» With an eye on Russia, China and a horse, Pentagon chief visits Mongolia
» Pentagon Claims Iran Uses GPS Jamming in the Gulf So It Can Lure and Seize Foreign Ships
» USAF X-37B Military Space Planes Mystery Mission Circling Earth Hits 700 Days
» China destabilizing Indo-Pacific: U.S. Defense Secretary
» EU must change its negotiating terms for Brexit, says Barclay

 Reportsread more rss

» A Brief History of the CIA’s Dirty War in South Sudan
» US GDP report: Keynes on steroids
» Are Russia and the US Finally on the Same Page in Afghanistan?
» The IMF Takeover of Pakistan
» Voices from Syria’s Rukban Refugee Camp Belie Corporate Media Reporting
» Report Shows Corporations and Bolsonaro Teaming Up to Destroy the Amazon
» Ukraine: the presidents change, but the oligarchical system remains the same
» The Cowardice of Aung San Suu Kyi

 Commentariesread more rss

» The Biggest Threat to the US Indo-Pacific Strategy? Washington Itself.
» Ukraine on the cusp of change
» India’s Looming Agricultural Crisis: A Unique Chance to Change the System?
» The Saker interviews Stephen Karganovic
» Media and Politicians Ignore Oncoming Financial Crisis
» In an astonishing turn, George Soros and Charles Koch team up to end US ‘forever war’ policy
» Vladimir Putin says liberalism has ‘become obsolete’
» You Are Fighting In The Most Important Battle Of All Time

 Analysisread more rss

» A battle for supremacy between China and the US
» UAE Withdrawal from Yemen
» US, Pakistan move in tandem to end Afghan war
» Is Baoshang Bank China’s Lehman Brothers?
» From the Green Revolution to GMOs: Toxic Agriculture Is the Problem Not the Solution
» OPEC+ oil supply cuts signal smooth Gulf sailing
» G20 Osaka: the end of American leadership?
» Trump’s Brilliant Strategy to Dismember U.S. Dollar Hegemony
 
text version The site was founded by Natalia Laval in 2006 © 2006-2026 Inca Group "War and Peace"