Registration / Login
text version
War and Peace

 Hot news

Main page » News » View
Printable version
China backs Doha talks with Taliban
26.06.13 15:12 Asia rising

Was it the time difference between Beijing on the one hand and Kabul and Moscow - and Belfast - on the other that explains the Chinese foreign ministry statement on Wednesday hailing the peace talks with the Taliban in Doha? The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying spoke a day too soon in welcoming the “positive development of the ongoing reconciliation process in Afghanistan.” In a statement on Wednesday, here, she hailed the opening of the Taliban office in Doha and said, “China has always supported a reconciliation process for the country that is run by the Afghans themselves.” 


Alas, Hua spoke too soon. As it turned out, in the lengthy Conference Call by the two senior US officials accompanying President Barack Obama to the G8 summit meeting in Northern Ireland — it doesn’t need much ingenuity to identify them — it is apparent that their president put together the Doha talks with the robust help of Germany, Norway and UK.


Afghan President Hamid Karzai, on the other hand, thinks — rightly so — the proposed talks are neither “Afghan-led” nor “Afghan-owned” but in reality are US-controlled; and, of course, Russian Foreign Ministry entirely agrees with Karzai. 


Even Islamabad seems hedging. The intriguing thing is whether Hua made the faux pas with a purpose or whether it was a Freudian slip. But then, she read out a statement with deliberation, which was crafted by the “Afghan hands” in Beijing. 


Obviously, it is a statement that would gladden the hearts of the US officials — that Beijing is supportive and appreciative of the brilliant work done by them in finally getting Mullah Omar’s aides to the negotiating table to discuss a truce. 


Beijing is being manifestly helpful on an issue, which is critical to Obama’s presidency. Following the North Korea problem, Afghanistan becomes the second international issue where Beijing hopes to be on the same page as Washington. It revives the spirit of the California summit — after all the unpleasantness that Edward Snowden created. 


However, in intrinsic terms, too, Beijing’s stance on the Taliban’s reconciliation is a many-splendoured thing. It is a stance distilled purely out of China’s self-interest and devoid of any principle or high ideals or concerns for regional security. 


Simply put, Beijing has concluded that the US-Pakistan-Taliban axis could be the winning thing and it is in China’s interest to be with the winning side. 


Put differently, Beijing is factoring in the return of the Taliban to Afghanistan’s power structure. It may take newer forms in comparison with the outright Pakistani invasion in the mid-1990s but as the Chinese see it, the Taliban are returning and the wise thing to do is to begin cultivating them as the future rulers of Afghanistan. 


Of course, China has big economic stakes in Afghanistan. It hopes to corner a hefty share of Afghanistan’s vast mineral wealth and just as China cultivated the Watan Group during the Karzai era, there is need to build bridges with the Taliban. Being early in the game helps, always, in securing business. 


This is one thing. Again, assuming the US does establish the nine military bases in Afghanistan, it is all the more important that China consolidates its political influence in Kabul. 


Indeed, Beijing and the Taliban go a long way and they are by no means strangers. The all-weather friendship with Pakistan surely helps China, as Islamabad will never instigate the Taliban to subvert Xinjiang. But in such matters of national security, it is always best to deal directly with the principals. 


Thus, all said, China is securing its interests under all conceivable circumstances. Hua’s statement underscores the pragmatic thinking in Beijing. Unlike Russia, China doesn’t lose sleep over Islamism. In the ultimate analysis, it remains confident it can finesse the Taliban as partners in joint enterprises that can be very rewarding to both sides. 


The Foreign Policy magazine has an insightful piece on the curious ways in which the Chinese mind could be working as regards the Afghan endgame. Read it here.

 
26.06.13 15:24

Afghanistan, US reaffirm support for Taleban peace deal


Ðóññêèé
Archive
Forum

 Exclusiveread more rss

» Destruction of Ukraine’s Central Bank
» The World files their 27 Grievances against the United States of America.
» Yom Kippur War Redux – Petrol D0llar’s Last Hurrah
» How the Alchemists saved the Planet in 2019
» What will the US Treaty of Paris look like?
» Addition by Subtraction, (x, y)↦x−y
» Too Little, Too Late, will there be a Romanov ending for the Sudairi Seven?
» Week 21: When economic arguments end, the arms race begins

 Newsread more rss

» Afghan Taliban leader accuses U.S. of creating doubts over pact
» Kyrgyz President Accuses Atambayev of Violating Constitution by Resisting Detention
» Chinese foreign ministry slams U.S. interference in Venezuela
» With an eye on Russia, China and a horse, Pentagon chief visits Mongolia
» Pentagon Claims Iran Uses GPS Jamming in the Gulf So It Can Lure and Seize Foreign Ships
» USAF X-37B Military Space Planes Mystery Mission Circling Earth Hits 700 Days
» China destabilizing Indo-Pacific: U.S. Defense Secretary
» EU must change its negotiating terms for Brexit, says Barclay

 Reportsread more rss

» A Brief History of the CIA’s Dirty War in South Sudan
» US GDP report: Keynes on steroids
» Are Russia and the US Finally on the Same Page in Afghanistan?
» The IMF Takeover of Pakistan
» Voices from Syria’s Rukban Refugee Camp Belie Corporate Media Reporting
» Report Shows Corporations and Bolsonaro Teaming Up to Destroy the Amazon
» Ukraine: the presidents change, but the oligarchical system remains the same
» The Cowardice of Aung San Suu Kyi

 Commentariesread more rss

» The Biggest Threat to the US Indo-Pacific Strategy? Washington Itself.
» Ukraine on the cusp of change
» India’s Looming Agricultural Crisis: A Unique Chance to Change the System?
» The Saker interviews Stephen Karganovic
» Media and Politicians Ignore Oncoming Financial Crisis
» In an astonishing turn, George Soros and Charles Koch team up to end US ‘forever war’ policy
» Vladimir Putin says liberalism has ‘become obsolete’
» You Are Fighting In The Most Important Battle Of All Time

 Analysisread more rss

» A battle for supremacy between China and the US
» UAE Withdrawal from Yemen
» US, Pakistan move in tandem to end Afghan war
» Is Baoshang Bank China’s Lehman Brothers?
» From the Green Revolution to GMOs: Toxic Agriculture Is the Problem Not the Solution
» OPEC+ oil supply cuts signal smooth Gulf sailing
» G20 Osaka: the end of American leadership?
» Trump’s Brilliant Strategy to Dismember U.S. Dollar Hegemony
 
text version The site was founded by Natalia Laval in 2006 © 2006-2024 Inca Group "War and Peace"