|
WAR and PEACE
|
|
|
|
» » View
|
| Printable version |
| US-IRAQ: Generals Seek to Reverse Obama Withdrawal Decision |
| 04.02.09 20:39 |
Iraq War, "War on terror" |
|
CENTCOM commander Gen. David Petraeus, supported by Defence Secretary Robert Gates, tried to convince President Barack Obama that he had to back down from his campaign pledge to withdraw all U.S. combat troops from Iraq within 16 months at an Oval Office meeting Jan. 21.
But Obama informed Gates, Petraeus and Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen that he wasn't convinced and that he wanted Gates and the military leaders to come back quickly with a detailed 16-month plan, according to two sources who have talked with participants in the meeting.
Obama's decision to override Petraeus's recommendation has not ended the conflict between the president and senior military officers over troop withdrawal, however. There are indications that Petraeus and his allies in the military and the Pentagon, including Gen. Ray Odierno, now the top commander in Iraq, have already begun to try to pressure Obama to change his withdrawal policy.
A network of senior military officers is also reported to be preparing to support Petraeus and Odierno by mobilising public opinion against Obama's decision.
Petraeus was visibly unhappy when he left the Oval Office, according to one of the sources. A White House staffer present at the meeting was quoted by the source as saying, "Petraeus made the mistake of thinking he was still dealing with George Bush instead of with Barack Obama."
Petraeus, Gates and Odierno had hoped to sell Obama on a plan that they formulated in the final months of the Bush administration that aimed at getting around a key provision of the U.S.-Iraqi withdrawal agreement signed envisioned re-categorising large numbers of combat troops as support troops. That subterfuge was by the United States last November while ostensibly allowing Obama to deliver on his campaign promise.
Gates and Mullen had discussed the relabeling scheme with Obama as part of the Petraeus-Odierno plan for withdrawal they had presented to him in mid-December, according to a Dec. 18 New York Times story.
Obama decided against making any public reference to his order to the military to draft a detailed 16-month combat troop withdrawal policy, apparently so that he can announce his decision only after consulting with his field commanders and the Pentagon.
The first clear indication of the intention of Petraeus, Odierno and their allies to try to get Obama to amend his decision came on Jan. 29 when the New York Times published an interview with Odierno, ostensibly based on the premise that Obama had indicated that he was "open to alternatives".
The Times reported that Odierno had "developed a plan that would move slower than Mr. Obama's campaign timetable" and had suggested in an interview "it might take the rest of the year to determine exactly when United States forces could be drawn down significantly".
The opening argument by the Petraeus-Odierno faction against Obama's withdrawal policy was revealed the evening of the Jan. 21 meeting when retired Army Gen. Jack Keane, one of the authors of the Bush troop surge policy and a close political ally and mentor of Gen. Petraeus, appeared on the Lehrer News Hour to comment on Obama's pledge on Iraq combat troop withdrawal.
Keane, who had certainly been briefed by Petraeus on the outcome of the Oval Office meeting, argued that implementing such a withdrawal of combat troops would "increase the risk rather dramatically over the 16 months". He asserted that it would jeopardise the "stable political situation in Iraq" and called that risk "not acceptable".
The assertion that Obama's withdrawal policy threatens the gains allegedly won by the Bush surge and Petraeus's strategy in Iraq will apparently be the theme of the campaign that military opponents are now planning.
Keane, the Army Vice-Chief of Staff from 1999 to 2003, has ties to a network of active and retired four-star Army generals, and since Obama's Jan. 21 order on the 16-month withdrawal plan, some of the retired four-star generals in that network have begun discussing a campaign to blame Obama's troop withdrawal from Iraq for the ultimate collapse of the political "stability" that they expect to follow U.S. withdrawal, according to a military source familiar with the network's plans.
The source says the network, which includes senior active duty officers in the Pentagon, will begin making the argument to journalists covering the Pentagon that Obama's withdrawal policy risks an eventual collapse in Iraq. That would raise the political cost to Obama of sticking to his withdrawal policy.
If Obama does not change the policy, according to the source, they hope to have planted the seeds of a future political narrative blaming his withdrawal policy for the "collapse" they expect in an Iraq without U.S. troops.
That line seems likely to appeal to reporters covering the Iraq troop withdrawal issue. Ever since Obama's inauguration, media coverage of the issue has treated Obama' s 16-month withdrawal proposal as a concession to anti-war sentiment which will have to be adjusted to the "realities" as defined by the advice to Obama from Gates, Petreaus and Odierno.
Ever since he began working on the troop surge, Keane has been the central figure manipulating policy in order to keep as many U.S. troops in Iraq as possible. It was Keane who got Vice President Dick Cheney to push for Petraeus as top commander in Iraq in late 2006 when the existing commander, Gen. George W. Casey, did not support the troop surge.
It was Keane who protected Petraeus's interests in ensuring the maximum number of troops in Iraq against the efforts by other military leaders to accelerate troop withdrawal in 2007 and 2008. As Bob Woodward reported in "The War Within", Keane persuaded President George W. Bush to override the concerns of the Joint Chiefs of Staff about the stress of prolonged U.S. occupation of Iraq on the U.S. Army and Marine Corps as well its impact on the worsening situation in Afghanistan.
Bush agreed in September 2007 to guarantee that Petraeus would have as many troops as he needed for as long as wanted, according to Woodward's account.
Keane had also prevailed on Gates in April 2008 to make Petraeus the new commander of CENTCOM. Keane argued that keeping Petraeus in the field was the best insurance against a Democratic administration reversing the Bush policy toward Iraq.
Keane had operated on the assumption that a Democratic president would probably not take the political risk of rejecting Petraeus's recommendation on the pace of troop withdrawal from Iraq. Woodward quotes Keane as telling Gates, "Let's assume we have a Democratic administration and they want to pull this thing out quickly, and now they have to deal with General Petraeus and General Odierno. There will be a price to be paid to override them."
Obama told Petraeus in Baghdad last July that, if elected, he would regard the overall health of the U.S. Army and Marine Corps and the situation in Afghanistan as more important than Petraeus's obvious interest in maximising U.S. troop strength in Iraq, according to Time magazine's Joe Klein.
But judging from Petraeus's shock at Obama's Jan. 21 decision, he had not taken Obama's previous rejection of his arguments seriously. That miscalculation suggests that Petraeus had begun to accept Keane's assertion that a newly-elected Democratic president would not dare to override his policy recommendation on troops in Iraq. |
| |
|
|
Ðóññêèé
Archive
Forum
|
| | » | Destruction of Ukraine’s Central Bank |
| » | The World files their 27 Grievances against the United States of America. |
| » | Yom Kippur War Redux – Petrol D0llar’s Last Hurrah |
| » | How the Alchemists saved the Planet in 2019 |
| » | What will the US Treaty of Paris look like? |
| » | Addition by Subtraction, (x, y)↦x−y |
| » | Too Little, Too Late, will there be a Romanov ending for the Sudairi Seven? |
| » | Week 21: When economic arguments end, the arms race begins |
| | » | Afghan Taliban leader accuses U.S. of creating doubts over pact |
| » | Kyrgyz President Accuses Atambayev of Violating Constitution by Resisting Detention |
| » | Chinese foreign ministry slams U.S. interference in Venezuela |
| » | With an eye on Russia, China and a horse, Pentagon chief visits Mongolia |
| » | Pentagon Claims Iran Uses GPS Jamming in the Gulf So It Can Lure and Seize Foreign Ships |
| » | USAF X-37B Military Space Planes Mystery Mission Circling Earth Hits 700 Days |
| » | China destabilizing Indo-Pacific: U.S. Defense Secretary |
| » | EU must change its negotiating terms for Brexit, says Barclay |
| | » | A Brief History of the CIA’s Dirty War in South Sudan |
| » | US GDP report: Keynes on steroids |
| » | Are Russia and the US Finally on the Same Page in Afghanistan? |
| » | The IMF Takeover of Pakistan |
| » | Voices from Syria’s Rukban Refugee Camp Belie Corporate Media Reporting |
| » | Report Shows Corporations and Bolsonaro Teaming Up to Destroy the Amazon |
| » | Ukraine: the presidents change, but the oligarchical system remains the same |
| » | The Cowardice of Aung San Suu Kyi |
| | » | The Biggest Threat to the US Indo-Pacific Strategy? Washington Itself. |
| » | Ukraine on the cusp of change |
| » | India’s Looming Agricultural Crisis: A Unique Chance to Change the System? |
| » | The Saker interviews Stephen Karganovic |
| » | Media and Politicians Ignore Oncoming Financial Crisis |
| » | In an astonishing turn, George Soros and Charles Koch team up to end US ‘forever war’ policy |
| » | Vladimir Putin says liberalism has ‘become obsolete’ |
| » | You Are Fighting In The Most Important Battle Of All Time |
| | » | A battle for supremacy between China and the US |
| » | UAE Withdrawal from Yemen |
| » | US, Pakistan move in tandem to end Afghan war |
| » | Is Baoshang Bank China’s Lehman Brothers? |
| » | From the Green Revolution to GMOs: Toxic Agriculture Is the Problem Not the Solution |
| » | OPEC+ oil supply cuts signal smooth Gulf sailing |
| » | G20 Osaka: the end of American leadership? |
| » | Trump’s Brilliant Strategy to Dismember U.S. Dollar Hegemony |
|
|
