Registration / Login
text version
War and Peace

 Hot news

Main page » News » View
Printable version
New approach to old alliance for Saudi King and Obama
03.09.15 20:10 Middle East

Saudi Arabias King Salman will meet U.S. President Barack Obama in Washington on Friday, aiming to push him for more support in Riyadhs efforts to counter Iran after it agreed to a nuclear deal that will relieve Tehran of some international pressure.

Despite Saudi disappointment with Obamas push for a nuclear deal with Iran and his lack of direct action against President Bashar al-Assad in Syria, the U.S. role in Riyadhs war in Yemen shows Washington remains the kingdoms core strategic partner.

"The relationship is entering a new phase. It is still a partnership, but Saudi Arabia is becoming more independent. And I think the Americans like that. They are not objecting to our active foreign policy, but cooperating with us on that front," said Jamal Khashoggi, head of al-Arab News Channel, owned by Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal.

The relationship, a mainstay of the Middle Easts security balance, has suffered turbulence since Riyadh faulted what it saw as Obamas withdrawal from the region, and a perceived tilt toward Iran since the 2011 Arab uprisings.

Since Salman took power in January, he has abandoned Riyadhs traditional reliance on Washington to do the heavy lifting in Middle East security, instead embarking on a war in Yemen and boosting support for rebels against Assad in Syria.

It showed both Riyadhs increasing sense of independence, and willingness to work with regional allies instead of Washington. But it also a more transactional approach to relations with the United States.

Unlike at some earlier points in the relationship, cooperation now appears to be limited, either to instances where interests directly overlap, or to support in one area in exchange for another.

Obama has been keen for Washingtons allies to take on a bigger role in regional security issues as part of his efforts to reduce American involvement in the Middle Easts many messy conflicts.

On Wednesday, Jeff Prescott, National Security Council senior director for Iran, Iraq, Syria and the Gulf, told reporters that Washington had been "looking to support Saudi efforts to build their own capabilities and build their own capacity to act."

NUCLEAR FALLOUT

The clearest evidence of that shift in the relationship is in Yemen, where Riyadh formed a coalition of 10 Arab states in air strikes against the Iran-allied Houthi forces in March, a campaign that relies heavily on American military assistance.

While U.S. officials have talked of a need for Riyadh to do more to avoid civilian casualties, Washingtons role in accelerating weapons delivery as well as intelligence and logistical aid has been indispensable to the Saudi war effort.

Many Saudis regard such material American support in the Yemen war as part of Obamas efforts to reassure the kingdom and its Gulf allies that the Iran nuclear deal does not mean Washington will allow Tehran to dominate the Middle East.

Riyadh is convinced that Iran is bent on achieving regional hegemony through proxy militias in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Yemen, thereby destabilizing the entire region and undermining the kingdoms own stability.

Washington, while critical of Irans regional role, does not see it in such dire terms.

The Saudis fear that by relieving sanctions on Iran, the nuclear deal will give Tehran more money and political freedom to back clients like Hezbollah in Lebanon and Iraqs Shiite militias, as well as allies like Yemens Houthis.

"Saudi Arabia is way more concerned about current regional matters, not the hypothetical threat from an Iranian bomb. Washington should not get free support for the deal unless they commit more to current Saudi concerns in the region," said Khashoggi of the al-Arab channel.

Riyadhs public response to the deal, combining lukewarm praise with the proviso that its success would depend on tough inspections, was accompanied by private expressions of concern by Saudi officials.

SYRIAN CRISIS

The next big test of ties between the two countries is likely to be in Syria, where Saudi Arabia has frequently described Assads use of air raids and artillery on civilian areas as genocidal, and has described Irans support for militias there as constituting an occupation.

While Obama has said Assad can have no role in Syrias future, his bigger focus has been on the militant threat posed by Islamic State.

While Riyadh helped corral regional states to join U.S.-led air strikes against IS in Syria last year, it has been disappointed by Washingtons limited efforts to train and arm non-jihadist rebel groups.

Ben Rhodes, the U.S. deputy national security adviser, alluded to Washingtons own worries that by backing the Syrian opposition too fulsomely, there was a risk of inadvertently strengthening militant groups, in comments to media on Wednesday.

"We want to make sure that when we are working with our Gulf partners and Turkey ... that we have a common view in terms of which opposition deserves our support and that were seeking to isolate more extremist elements of the opposition," he said.

Saudi Arabia, along with Qatar and Turkey, appears to have stepped up the backing of rebel groups this year, helping them to achieve advances against Assad. If its Yemen campaign succeeds, with American help, Riyadh may be emboldened to increase that support still further.

 

Ðóññêèé
Archive
Forum

 Exclusiveread more rss

» Destruction of Ukraine’s Central Bank
» The World files their 27 Grievances against the United States of America.
» Yom Kippur War Redux – Petrol D0llar’s Last Hurrah
» How the Alchemists saved the Planet in 2019
» What will the US Treaty of Paris look like?
» Addition by Subtraction, (x, y)↦x−y
» Too Little, Too Late, will there be a Romanov ending for the Sudairi Seven?
» Week 21: When economic arguments end, the arms race begins

 Newsread more rss

» Afghan Taliban leader accuses U.S. of creating doubts over pact
» Kyrgyz President Accuses Atambayev of Violating Constitution by Resisting Detention
» Chinese foreign ministry slams U.S. interference in Venezuela
» With an eye on Russia, China and a horse, Pentagon chief visits Mongolia
» Pentagon Claims Iran Uses GPS Jamming in the Gulf So It Can Lure and Seize Foreign Ships
» USAF X-37B Military Space Planes Mystery Mission Circling Earth Hits 700 Days
» China destabilizing Indo-Pacific: U.S. Defense Secretary
» EU must change its negotiating terms for Brexit, says Barclay

 Reportsread more rss

» A Brief History of the CIA’s Dirty War in South Sudan
» US GDP report: Keynes on steroids
» Are Russia and the US Finally on the Same Page in Afghanistan?
» The IMF Takeover of Pakistan
» Voices from Syria’s Rukban Refugee Camp Belie Corporate Media Reporting
» Report Shows Corporations and Bolsonaro Teaming Up to Destroy the Amazon
» Ukraine: the presidents change, but the oligarchical system remains the same
» The Cowardice of Aung San Suu Kyi

 Commentariesread more rss

» The Biggest Threat to the US Indo-Pacific Strategy? Washington Itself.
» Ukraine on the cusp of change
» India’s Looming Agricultural Crisis: A Unique Chance to Change the System?
» The Saker interviews Stephen Karganovic
» Media and Politicians Ignore Oncoming Financial Crisis
» In an astonishing turn, George Soros and Charles Koch team up to end US ‘forever war’ policy
» Vladimir Putin says liberalism has ‘become obsolete’
» You Are Fighting In The Most Important Battle Of All Time

 Analysisread more rss

» A battle for supremacy between China and the US
» UAE Withdrawal from Yemen
» US, Pakistan move in tandem to end Afghan war
» Is Baoshang Bank China’s Lehman Brothers?
» From the Green Revolution to GMOs: Toxic Agriculture Is the Problem Not the Solution
» OPEC+ oil supply cuts signal smooth Gulf sailing
» G20 Osaka: the end of American leadership?
» Trump’s Brilliant Strategy to Dismember U.S. Dollar Hegemony
 
text version The site was founded by Natalia Laval in 2006 © 2006-2024 Inca Group "War and Peace"