Registration / Login
War and Peace

 Hot news

Russia, NATO end talks on sectoral missile defense - source
Victory Day parade held on Moscows Red Square
Pakistan seeks solace in the Kremlin
Kremlin lacking WTO will
Main page » News » View
Printable version
ABM Treaty: U.S. Withdrawal Statement
19.02.10 16:51 Memories

December 13, 2001

Office of the Press Secretary, White House

STATEMENT BY THE PRESS SECRETARY

ANNOUNCEMENT OF WITHDRAWAL FROM THE ABM TREATY

The circumstances affecting U.S. national security have changed fundamentally since the signing of the ABM Treaty in 1972. The attacks against the U.S. homeland on September 11 vividly demonstrate that the threats we face today are far different from those of the Cold War. During that era, now fortunately in the past, the United States and the Soviet Union were locked in an implacably hostile relationship. Each side deployed thousands of nuclear weapons pointed at the other. Our ultimate security rested largely on the grim premise that neither side would launch a nuclear attack because doing so would result in a counter-attack ensuring the total destruction of both nations.

Today, our security environment is profoundly different. The Cold War is over. The Soviet Union no longer exists. Russia is not an enemy, but in fact is increasingly allied with us on a growing number of critically important issues. The depth of United States-Russian cooperation in counterterrorism is both a model of the new strategic relationship we seek to establish and a foundation on which to build further cooperation across the broad spectrum of political, economic and security issues of mutual interest.

Today, the United States and Russia face new threats to their security. Principal among these threats are weapons of mass destruction and their delivery means wielded by terrorists and rogue states. A number of such states are acquiring increasingly longer-range ballistic missiles as instruments of blackmail and coercion against the United States and its friends and allies. The United States must defend its homeland, its forces and its friends and allies against these threats. We must develop and deploy the means to deter and protect against them, including through limited missile defense of our territory.

Under the terms of the ABM Treaty, the United States is prohibited from defending its homeland against ballistic missile attack. We are also prohibited from cooperating in developing missile defenses against long-range threats with our friends and allies. Given the emergence of these new threats to our national security and the imperative of defending against them, the United States is today providing formal notification of its withdrawal from the ABM Treaty. As provided in Article XV of that Treaty, the effective date of withdrawal will be six months from today.

At the same time, the United States looks forward to moving ahead with Russia in developing elements of a new strategic relationship.

- In the inter-related area of offensive nuclear forces, we welcome President Putins commitment to deep cuts in Russian nuclear forces, and reaffirm our own commitment to reduce U.S. nuclear forces significantly.

- We look forward to continued consultations on how to achieve increased transparency and predictability regarding reductions in offensive nuclear forces.

- We also look forward to continued consultations on transparency, confidence building, and cooperation on missile defenses, such as joint exercises and potential joint development programs.

- The United States also plans to discuss with Russia ways to establish regular defense planning talks to exchange information on strategic force issues, and to deepen cooperation on efforts to prevent and deal with the effects of the spread of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery.

The United States intends to expand cooperation in each of these areas and to work intensively with Russia to further develop and formalize the new strategic relationship between the two countries.

The United States believes that moving beyond the ABM Treaty will contribute to international peace and security. We stand ready to continue our active dialogue with allies, China, and other interested states on all issues associated with strategic stability and how we can best cooperate to meet the threats of the 21st century. We believe such a dialogue is in the interest of all states.

 
Ñèñòåìà Orphus: ORPS
Ðóññêèé
Archive
Forum
     .

 Exclusiveread more rss

» The Geopolitical Stakes in Nigeria— Part I: The Curious Role of the IMF
» Why Washington Wants ‘Finito’ with Putin
» Moscows High Stakes Energy Geopolitics
» Libya in Headlines
» Would appear the wind has changed direction
» Getting used to life without food: Wall Street, BP, bio-ethanol and the death of millions
» Creative Destruction: Libya in Washingtons Greater Middle East Project
» Egypts Revolution: Creative Destruction for a Greater Middle East?

 Newsread more rss

» Tinker raiders, soldier, spy
» The blond Norwegian, 32, arrested over holiday island massacre and linked to Oslo car bomb blasts
» Pakistan doesn’t need US military trainers
» Ahmadinejad wants Iran-China trade to reach 100 billion dollars
» US to pursue international approach to cyber defence
» Sudan signs peace accord with Darfur rebels
» Iran determined to improve ties with Europe
» Obama to host Dalai Lama at White House

 Reportsread more rss

» Sex selection: The forgotten story
» Risk-Free And Above The Law: U.S. Globalizes Drone Warfare
» Russia and China challenge NATO
» How Safe is Your Food? GMO, Foodborne Illnesses and Biotechnology
» Chinese pieces to Irans nuclear puzzle
» Gene Sharp - How to Start a Revolution
» US in a state of decline?
» From NAFTA to CETA: Canada-EU Deep Economic Integration

 Commentariesread more rss

» NATO installs Al-CIA-da man in charge of Tripoli and Libya
» AFRICOM Is In Place, The Recolonization Of Africa Commences
» Financial Turbulence Shakes the Eurozone: Facing the Debt Crisis in Europe
» Pakistan seeks solace in the Kremlin
» Turkey and the Middle East: The Reshaping of Regional Relations
» Did Britain try to assassinate Lenin?
» Road to Cairo passes through Brussels
» Eurozone needs more clarity

 Analysisread more rss

» From state debt to state money
» Financial Crimes on Wall Street and the Debt Crisis
» Why Banks Aren’t Lending: The Silent Liquidity Squeeze
» Libya and the decline of the petrodollar system
» Humanitarian Neo-colonialism: Framing Libya and Reframing War
» The perfect (desert) storm
» Gold and fiat currencies
» Coup d’état - The Historical Framework of Globalization

Links

»Asia Times
»Commondreams
»Geopolitics - Geoeconomics
»GlobalResearch
»Information Clearing House
»Iraq-war.ru
»The Truth Seeker
»The writings of Israel Shamir
»WhatReallyHappened.com
 
text version © 2006-2012 Inca Group "War and Peace"