| 
|   | WAR and PEACE |  
|  |  
| »  » View |  
| 
| Printable version |  | Tajikistan deviates from CASA script |  
| 26.06.13 15:17 | f.USSR |  |  |  | By Fozil Mashrab 
 The government of Tajikistan and the World Bank have been the two main  driving forces behind the implementation of the Central Asia South Asia  power export project widely known by its acronym CASA1000. This project  envisions erecting thousands of kilometers of high-voltage electricity  transmission lines at the cost of around US$1 billion.
 
 Once completed the project will make it possible for the export of at  least 1000 megawatts of surplus electricity available in Tajikistan and  Kyrgyzstan in summer seasons to Pakistan via Afghanistan.  War-torn  Afghanistan would also benefit by getting 300 MW of electricity at discounted prices in addition to transit fees.
 
 According to World Bank estimates, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan, the two  upper-stream Central Asian countries sitting at the top of two ancient  regional rivers - Amu-Darya and Syr-Darya respectively - have  during  summer seasons extra electricity-generating capacities that could be  channeled to energy-hungry Pakistan and Afghanistan. The argument goes  that currently these two Central Asia countries cannot fully capitalize  on their electricity generating hydropower potentials in summer time as  there are no  transmission lines to carry their electricity exports to  overseas markets. Hence, the need for the CASA project.
 
 However, downstream neighbor Uzbekistan, which has longstanding water  disputes with its two upper-stream neighbors,  remains suspicious and  unconvinced that the proposed CASA project will not be used to justify  the construction of controversial mega-dams in Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan  for the purpose of making this project economically viable.
 
 To deflect the project’s critics and opponents, the World Bank has been  claiming that CASA project is economically viable relying only on  existing power generating potentials and summer-time exports and does  not require further expansion of hydro-power generating capacities in  Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan. World Bank officials refer to the Memorandum  of Understanding signed by the four governments -  Afghanistan,  Kyrgyzstan, Pakistan and Tajikistan - in Kabul in November 2007 which  has a "No Generation Expansion" clause.
 
 The World Bank regional director for Central Asia, Saroj Jha, also  previously repeatedly said in numerous interviews that "there is no need  to add any new power generation to make CASA a viable project".
 
 All along, World Bank officials have paid little attention to, or when  brought to their attention tend to dismiss, claims that the proposed  CASA project is being used by the Tajik government to justify the  construction of the controversial Rogun hydroelectric power station. If  constructed Rogun will  be the worlds tallest dam,  with a projected  height of 335 meters.
 
 While visiting Kyrgyzstan on May 28-29, Tajik President Emomali Rahmon  yet again openly linked the CASA project with his government’s plans to  construct the Rogun dam. As reported by Azeri Trend News Agency, in his  attempts to enlist the Kyrgyz government’s support for construction of  the Rogun dam, Rahmon proposed that Kyrgyz colleagues, who also have  strong disagreements with downstream Uzbekistan, to show solidarity with  his government and openly linked the CASA project to Rogun dam by  claiming that the former is not economically profitable without the  latter. In particular he said:
 We hope for Kyrgyzstans support in the regional project CASA-1000 and  on the construction of hydroelectric power plants. Under the CASA-1000  project, Tajikistan plans to export 3 billion kWh, but according to  experts  the project is not profitable unless two units of Rogun HPP  [hydro-power project] are running. In this issue, we hope for a common  position of Kyrgyzstan.The Tajik president’s statement in Bishkek clearly contrasted with all  previous claims by World Bank officials that the CASA project is  economically viable without any expansion of generating capacity in  power exporting countries and that there was no link between Rogun and  CASA. 
 In an August 2012 interview,  Saroj Jha  utterly dismissed the existence of any link between CASA and Rogun:
 
 Q:  Is the CASA-1000 Project linked to Rogun? Contrasting and contradictory statements by Tajik officials and World  Bank representatives on the CASA project or its link to Rogun dam are  nothing new.
 SJ: No, the CASA-1000 Project and Rogun are not linked.  Today, there is enough electricity during the summer months in the Tajik  and Kyrgyz systems to supply the CASA-1000 transmission lines during  summer. There is no need to add any new power generation to make CASA a  viable project. However, winter electricity shortages in Tajikistan and  the Kyrgyz Republic must be met in other ways. The World Bank is  supporting the CASA-1000 Project because it is an important first step  in the Central Asia - South Asia Regional Electricity Market. It would  support the trade of up to 1,300 MW of clean electricity between the two  regions and we believe it could serve as a transformative project for  both Central and South Asia.
 
 What was new this time was that for the first time Tajik president  himself, on the record, openly admitted the linkage between the two;  previously, only lower ranking Tajik officials would merely dare to  indirectly link their country’s plans to construct huge dams in their  territory to regional efforts aimed at enhancing inter-regional linkages  between Central Asia and South Asia and to international efforts to  stabilize neighboring Afghanistan.
 
 Tajik Foreign Minister Hamrokhon Zarifi once famously claimed that the  hydroelectric power stations to be built in Tajik territory would help  to wean Afghan farmers from harvesting poppy to growing "peaceful  crops".
 
 These kinds of mismatches between Tajik government and World Bank  statements are usually missed or are not usually reported by mainstream  media. But focusing  attention on these kinds of contradictions perhaps  helps partly to explain why some CASA project sponsors are increasingly  hesitant in their commitment or deciding to completely pull out of the  deal.
 
 A few days after the Tajik president’s statement on the link between the  CASA project and Rogun dam, Pakistani Express Tribune newspaper  reported that one of the co-sponsors of the CASA project - the Asian  Development Bank (ADB)  - decided to withdraw from the project. ADB was  expected to provide 40% of the US$966 million needed to complete the  CASA project.
 
 The official reason given for ADB’s decision was the existing  challenging security situation in Afghanistan. However, the real reasons  for ADB’s withdrawal from the project might lie in its unwillingness to  get entangled in a controversial project with an unclear commercial  future and pregnant with the possibility of exacerbating regional  divisions and disputes between the upper-stream and down-stream  countries in Central Asia.
 
 Importantly, however, there has been no news of ADB’s withdrawal from  another energy project linking Central Asia to South Asia - the  Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India (TAPI) natural gas pipeline,  which  also faces the same security challenges as the CASA project as it  also involves Afghanistan as the main transit country.
 
 The main difference between these two energy projects is that the TAPI  project is not linked to any regional disputes between the Central Asian  countries, while the CASA project is increasingly becoming part of the  water disputes between the upstream and downstream nations.
 
 As recently as  June 16,  the World Banks Saroj Jha was reported to  have been received by Tajikistans President Rahmon to discuss the  implementation of various joint projects including CASA.  Perhaps,  during the latest meeting Saroj Jha took the opportunity to explain to  his host that by making statements that deviate from World Bank’s   on CASA and Rogun he is undermining the implementation of the CASA  project and is also putting at risk the World Bank’s reputation, no  matter whether these statements are credible or not.
 
 Unlike the Asian Development Bank, the World Bank does not seem to have  done its due diligence in dealing with the  Tajik government; thus it  risks finding itself at the epicenter of water disputes between the  upstream and downstream countries in Central Asia.
 
 Fozil Mashrab is a pseudonym used by an independent analyst based in Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
 |  |  |  
 |  | 
| Ðóññêèé Archive
 Forum
 
 
 |  
| 
|  |  | » | Destruction of Ukraine’s Central Bank |  | » | The World files their 27 Grievances against the United States of America. |  | » | Yom Kippur War Redux – Petrol D0llar’s Last Hurrah |  | » | How the Alchemists saved the Planet in 2019 |  | » | What will the US Treaty of Paris look like? |  | » | Addition by Subtraction, (x, y)↦x−y |  | » | Too Little, Too Late, will there be a Romanov ending for the Sudairi Seven? |  | » | Week 21: When economic arguments end, the arms race begins |  |  |  | » | Afghan Taliban leader accuses U.S. of creating doubts over pact |  | » | Kyrgyz President Accuses Atambayev of Violating Constitution by Resisting Detention |  | » | Chinese foreign ministry slams U.S. interference in Venezuela |  | » | With an eye on Russia, China and a horse, Pentagon chief visits Mongolia |  | » | Pentagon Claims Iran Uses GPS Jamming in the Gulf So It Can Lure and Seize Foreign Ships |  | » | USAF X-37B Military Space Planes Mystery Mission Circling Earth Hits 700 Days |  | » | China destabilizing Indo-Pacific: U.S. Defense Secretary |  | » | EU must change its negotiating terms for Brexit, says Barclay |  |  |  | » | A Brief History of the CIA’s Dirty War in South Sudan |  | » | US GDP report: Keynes on steroids |  | » | Are Russia and the US Finally on the Same Page in Afghanistan? |  | » | The IMF Takeover of Pakistan |  | » | Voices from Syria’s Rukban Refugee Camp Belie Corporate Media Reporting |  | » | Report Shows Corporations and Bolsonaro Teaming Up to Destroy the Amazon |  | » | Ukraine: the presidents change, but the oligarchical system remains the same |  | » | The Cowardice of Aung San Suu Kyi |  |  |  | » | The Biggest Threat to the US Indo-Pacific Strategy? Washington Itself. |  | » | Ukraine on the cusp of change |  | » | India’s Looming Agricultural Crisis: A Unique Chance to Change the System? |  | » | The Saker interviews Stephen Karganovic |  | » | Media and Politicians Ignore Oncoming Financial Crisis |  | » | In an astonishing turn, George Soros and Charles Koch team up to end US ‘forever war’ policy |  | » | Vladimir Putin says liberalism has ‘become obsolete’ |  | » | You Are Fighting In The Most Important Battle Of All Time |  |  |  | » | A battle for supremacy between China and the US |  | » | UAE Withdrawal from Yemen |  | » | US, Pakistan move in tandem to end Afghan war |  | » | Is Baoshang Bank China’s Lehman Brothers? |  | » | From the Green Revolution to GMOs: Toxic Agriculture Is the Problem Not the Solution |  | » | OPEC+ oil supply cuts signal smooth Gulf sailing |  | » | G20 Osaka: the end of American leadership? |  | » | Trump’s Brilliant Strategy to Dismember U.S. Dollar Hegemony |  |  |