Registration / Login
text version
War and Peace

 Hot news

Main page » News » View
Printable version
Trump wants weaker dollar but it could be a hard sell
20.07.19 21:11 Economics

WASHINGTON/SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - President Donald Trump wants a cheaper dollar, saying earlier this month the United States should match what he says are efforts by other countries to weaken their own currencies - giving them an unfair trade advantage.

The comments have prompted speculation the president could order sales of the greenback, which is near a multi-decade high and, according to the International Monetary Fund on Wednesday, at least 6% stronger than warranted by economic fundamentals.

"Conditions seem increasingly favorable for the U.S. administration to intervene against perceived (dollar) overvaluation," Citi economists said in a note Wednesday.

Trump has railed repeatedly against the Federal Reserve for raising interest rates, complaining that the higher rates are holding back U.S. economic growth. But while signs increasingly point to the Feds cutting rates when it meets at the end of this month, the lower rates are unlikely to weaken the dollar to a level that Trump wants.

A weaker dollar could help U.S. businesses compete globally by making exports less expensive, boosting the economy and potentially helping Trumps bid for re-election in 2020.

But a currency intervention could spark pushback from other countries, jeopardize the dollar’s status as the world’s reserve currency and touch off market turmoil. It is also not clear the Trump administration can significantly weaken the dollar without help from the U.S. central bank, which operates independently, or new powers from Congress.

WHAT COULD TRUMP DO?

Trumps talking down the dollar - an unusual step for a U.S. president - has been effective, though less so more recently.

To weaken it further, the U.S. Treasury could sell the greenback to buy foreign currency, using dollars that it holds on reserve. It has not done that since spending $1.3 billion in September 2000 as part of an international effort to combat a collapse in Europes currency, the euro.

Most of Americas $126 billion in reserves are parked in its Exchange Stabilization Fund (ESF). But if Washingtons unilateral actions spark a currency war, that might not be enough firepower to win. "There are plenty of hedge funds that have more clout than that," said Paul Ashworth, an economist at Capital Economics.

By comparison, China has $3.1 trillion in reserves. Roughly $5 trillion are traded in the worlds currency markets each day.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said in an interview that the ESF was meant for minimizing distress in currency markets, a possible indication that Washington is not viewing it as a way to engineer a sustained weakening in the dollar.

"We always look at what the fund can be used for in different alternatives, but as of now there is no change in policy," he said. A Treasury spokeswoman added that the departments overall policy on the U.S. dollar has not changed.

The Treasury uses the Federal Reserve as its agent in financial markets, and traditionally the two agencies coordinate interventions. To intervene more heavily, the Treasury could require resources from the Federal Reserve, which might potentially create limitless dollars to sell.

The administration could also seek access to more funds from Congress, said Joseph Gagnon, fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics and a former economist at both the Fed and the Treasury. That might entail lifting a legal limit on the Treasurys borrowing authority, allowing the administration to raise more cash to buy foreign currencies. "If you get rid of the debt ceiling, its clear the U.S. would win in a currency war," said Gagnon. https://tmsnrt.rs/2kaagK4

CENTRAL BANK INDEPENDENCE

Getting the Fed on board would pose its own challenges. The Fed sets interest rates to meet mandates assigned by Congress: stable prices, full employment and moderate long-term interest rates.

A weaker dollar could make imports into the United States more expensive and help the Fed by pushing inflation toward the central banks 2% target. But intervening in foreign exchange markets to drive it lower would go against a 2013 agreement among finance ministers and central bankers of the worlds biggest economies to avoid using exchange rate targets to meet their economic objectives.

"It is not clear the Fed would be willing to act unilaterally in a way that would antagonize the Bank of Japan and the European Central Bank," said Brad Setser, a fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations.

Speaking on June 19, Fed Chair Jerome Powell declined to say whether the central bank would support a currency intervention, saying that exchange rate policy is the Treasurys responsibility.

CURRENCY AS A BAROMETER

Even with limitless dollars, it is not clear Washington could control the value of the dollar, which reflects the strength of the U.S. economy and the attractiveness of its assets compared with those of other countries.

A key source of the dollars strength is the relative weakness of the European economy which has led the European Central Bank to keep interest rates low while the Fed has raised borrowing costs since 2015.

The dollar has strengthened recently due to reduced investor appetite for risky assets amid rising trade tensions and a slowing global economy, according to the IMF assessment. The IMF said the euros valuation was appropriate for the euro zone as a whole but was too low for Germanys fundamentals.

"Interventionist measures to drive down the dollars value are likely to be overwhelmed by the configuration of macroeconomic fundamentals," said Eswar Prasad, a trade policy expert at Cornell University. https://tmsnrt.rs/2Sj673q

IT COULD HAPPEN ANYWAY

The dollar may be poised to weaken even without any actual U.S. intervention. Just the possibility is putting downward pressure on the greenback, said Stan Shipley, strategist at ISI Evercore.

Meanwhile, U.S. economic growth is widely expected to slow, closing the gap with growth in Europe. Widening U.S. budget deficits, which delivered a boost to growth and the dollar last year, could drag down the U.S. currency longer-term, economists say.

And the Feds expected rate cut later this month, along with further anticipated reductions over the next year or so, should also have an effect.

"Monetary policy itself looks like its almost certainly going to pull the dollar downward," said Erik Norland, an economist at CME Group, whose interest-rate futures market is widely used as a gauge of market expectations for Fed policy.

 

Ðóññêèé
Archive
Forum

 Exclusiveread more rss

» Destruction of Ukraine’s Central Bank
» The World files their 27 Grievances against the United States of America.
» Yom Kippur War Redux – Petrol D0llar’s Last Hurrah
» How the Alchemists saved the Planet in 2019
» What will the US Treaty of Paris look like?
» Addition by Subtraction, (x, y)↦x−y
» Too Little, Too Late, will there be a Romanov ending for the Sudairi Seven?
» Week 21: When economic arguments end, the arms race begins

 Newsread more rss

» Afghan Taliban leader accuses U.S. of creating doubts over pact
» Kyrgyz President Accuses Atambayev of Violating Constitution by Resisting Detention
» Chinese foreign ministry slams U.S. interference in Venezuela
» With an eye on Russia, China and a horse, Pentagon chief visits Mongolia
» Pentagon Claims Iran Uses GPS Jamming in the Gulf So It Can Lure and Seize Foreign Ships
» USAF X-37B Military Space Planes Mystery Mission Circling Earth Hits 700 Days
» China destabilizing Indo-Pacific: U.S. Defense Secretary
» EU must change its negotiating terms for Brexit, says Barclay

 Reportsread more rss

» A Brief History of the CIA’s Dirty War in South Sudan
» US GDP report: Keynes on steroids
» Are Russia and the US Finally on the Same Page in Afghanistan?
» The IMF Takeover of Pakistan
» Voices from Syria’s Rukban Refugee Camp Belie Corporate Media Reporting
» Report Shows Corporations and Bolsonaro Teaming Up to Destroy the Amazon
» Ukraine: the presidents change, but the oligarchical system remains the same
» The Cowardice of Aung San Suu Kyi

 Commentariesread more rss

» The Biggest Threat to the US Indo-Pacific Strategy? Washington Itself.
» Ukraine on the cusp of change
» India’s Looming Agricultural Crisis: A Unique Chance to Change the System?
» The Saker interviews Stephen Karganovic
» Media and Politicians Ignore Oncoming Financial Crisis
» In an astonishing turn, George Soros and Charles Koch team up to end US ‘forever war’ policy
» Vladimir Putin says liberalism has ‘become obsolete’
» You Are Fighting In The Most Important Battle Of All Time

 Analysisread more rss

» A battle for supremacy between China and the US
» UAE Withdrawal from Yemen
» US, Pakistan move in tandem to end Afghan war
» Is Baoshang Bank China’s Lehman Brothers?
» From the Green Revolution to GMOs: Toxic Agriculture Is the Problem Not the Solution
» OPEC+ oil supply cuts signal smooth Gulf sailing
» G20 Osaka: the end of American leadership?
» Trump’s Brilliant Strategy to Dismember U.S. Dollar Hegemony
 
text version The site was founded by Natalia Laval in 2006 © 2006-2024 Inca Group "War and Peace"